As the number of extreme heat days continues to rise due to climate change, the high temperatures are taking a toll on our health—extreme heat has been linked to a range of health issues, including heatstroke, dehydration, and respiratory problems. But some people are at greater risk than others: warmer days are putting pregnant people at a higher risk for health complications.
In Africa, the intricate relationship between food security and health outcomes is increasingly challenged by the unpredictable forces of climate change. With this in mind, we utilized panel data spanning from 2010–2022 for 46 African nations, sub-grouped into regional panels to analyze the moderating role of climate change on food security- health outcome nexus, contributing to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2 (Zero Hunger), 3 (Good Health and Well-Being), and 13 (Climate Action). Considering issues of residual cross-sectional dependence and slope heterogeneity which are potential in panel data setting, the study utilized the Augmented Mean Group and the Common Correlated Mean Group techniques as the main methods in estimating the relationships amid the employed variables. Major outcomes from the study’s analysis revealed that, across all panels of African states, there is no doubt that climate change has a substantial, direct detrimental impact on health outcomes. Also, while the moderating effect of climate change is clearly negative in the case of Northern and Central regional panels, it is significantly positive in the aggregated, Eastern, Western, and Southern African regions with regard to the relationship between food security and health outcomes. In light of these findings, addressing the relationship between food security and health in Africa while taking the moderating impacts of climate change into account requires a region-specific approach.
Caring about the environment can feel especially daunting these days. Even before our current political challenges, environmentalists faced long, drawn-out battles that take a toll on their mental health. With the continuous churn of anti-climate and environmental attacks, it’s no surprise that many people feel worn out, beaten, overwhelmed, helpless, and overpowered.
This is burnout, a very serious psychological state that you must attend to. It is not to be ignored.
The Aspergillus fumigatus species, in particular, could expand its range by 77% by 2100, reaching more northerly parts of Europe, Asia and the Americas, potentially exposing 9 million more people in Europe alone, new research projects.
Several studies have attempted to model the effects of climate change on the economy, with varying results. But one fact remains certain: The costs of climate change will hit emerging markets and developing countries the hardest.
Across Australia, communities are grappling with climate disasters that are striking more frequently and with greater intensity. Bushfires, floods and cyclones are no longer one-off events. And this pattern is predicted to worsen due to climate change.
As it becomes more common to face climate disasters again and again, what does this mean for the mental health and wellbeing of people affected?
In a new study published today in the Lancet Public Health, we found experiencing repeated disasters leads to more severe and sustained effects on mental health compared to experiencing a single disaster.
New Mexico’s decades-long drought combined with climate change have more farmers and ranchers embracing the six healthy soil principles, tailoring how each parcel of land is managed.
New Mexico’s farming practices date back at least 2,500 years but the state’s Healthy Soil Working Group said the arid climate and diverse ecology make a one-size-fits-all approach ineffective.
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia/Geneva – Extreme weather and climate change impacts are hitting every single aspect of socio-economic development in Africa and exacerbating hunger, insecurity and displacement, according to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) State of the Climate in Africa 2024 report.
A stark new study published on May 7 in Nature laid bare the extreme climate crises that today’s children will face throughout their lives.
Researchers analyzed the increasing level of human exposure to extreme weather events such as crop failures, cyclones, droughts, floods, heatwaves, and wildfires. They determined that people born in 2020 are two to seven times more likely to witness “one-in-10,000-year events” throughout their lifetime than people born in 1960.
Climate change is not something coming to us in ‘the future’, it is very much with us ‘now’. With this time dimension very much settled, the impacts of climate crisis also depend on where we are, in geographical terms, and who we are (e.g., our place within a social structure). That’s why the climate change reality of Nordic fishermen is quite different from that of women shrimp-fry collectors of Bangladesh’s coast. But, if academia is essentially (and potentially) a highly connected global community, does it have a unique, uniform relationship with climate change? In other words, does climate change affect academia irrespective of one’s discipline, geographical location, age, professional experience, and academic culture?